// you’re reading...

Fractures in Children

ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA FOR REDUCTION IN PAEDIATRIC FRACTURES

acceptibility

Taral Nagda taralnagda@gmail.com

UPPER LIMB FRACTURES

Proximal humerus:

  • > 11 years of age : > 50 deg. Contact < 20 deg. angulation
  • < 11 years of age : relatively greater displacement and angulation can be accepted. Good to excellent long term outcomes can be expected regardless of the # displacement.

Shaft humerus:

  • Internal rotation: < 15 deg
  • Shortening: upto 1 to 2 cms.
  • Displacement and angulation:
    • < 5 years : Total displacement, Upto 70 deg. angulation
    • 5 to 12 years: 40 to 70 deg. angulation
    • > 12 years : 50 % contact , < 40 deg. angulation

Supracondylar fracture humerus

  • Anterior humeral line transecting capitellum
  • Baumann angle – 70-78 deg. or equal to the other side
  • Intact olecranon fossa
  • Translation upto 30 %
  • Rotations 20-30 degrees
  • Varus/ valgus angulation not acceptable

Radius ulna

  • < 9 years - 15 deg. Angulation, 45 deg. Malrotation, Complete displacement, Straightening of radius
  • 9-14 years- 10 deg. Angulation, 30 deg. malrotation, Complete displacement, Some loss of radial bow

Fracture radial neck

  • Younger children: 30-45 degrees
  • Older Children: 15 degrees

LOWER LIMB FRACTURES

Fracture neck femur :

Only anatomical reduction is acceptable

Fracture shaft femur:

  • 0-6 months of age: < 1.5 cm. Of shortening, < 30 deg angulation in varus valgus plane,< 30 deg. angualtion in AP plane
  • 6 months -6 years: < 2 cms of shortening,< 15 deg. angulation in varus valgus plane,< 20 deg. anterior angulation
  • 6 – 10 years < 1.5 cms. shortening, < 10 deg. varus valgus angulation, < 15 deg. AP angulation
  • > 10 years < 1 cm shortening,< 5 deg. varus valgus angulation,< 10 deg. AP angulation

Fracture – separation of distal physis of femur

In Salter Harris type 1 and 2

  • < 10 years < 20 deg. anterior or posterior angulation
  • > 10 years Only minimal AP angulation
  • < 5 deg. varus valgus angulation

In Salter Harris type 3 and 4

  • Anatomical reduction and ORIF

Fracture tibial tuberosity

Only minimally displaced fractures with possible active extension of knee to 0 deg. can be acceptable. Rest require ORIF

Fracture Patella

  • < 3 mm articular step off
  • < 3 mm diastasis on xray
  • Intact extensor mechanism

Fracture of tibia and fibula

A. Proximal metaphysis :

Closed reduction to anatomic position or slight varus is acceptable

B. Diaphysis:

< 8 years > 8 years
Varus <10 deg. < 5 deg.
Valgus < 5 deg. < 5 deg.
Ant. angulation < 10 deg. < 5 deg.
Post. Angulation < 5 deg. < 0 deg.
Shortening <10 mm < 5 mm
Rotation < 5 deg. < 5 deg.

C. Distal tibial fractures

  • Salter Harris type I & II

(i) in patients with atleast 2 years of growth remaining: < 15 deg. of posterior angulation,< 10 deg. of valgus angulation,0 deg. of varus angulation

(ii) in patients with less than 2 years of growth remaining Angulation in all planes < 5 deg.

  • Salter Harris type III & IV

< 2 mm displacement

Bibliography

1. Lovell and winter pediatric Orhtopaedics 5th edition Morrissey and Weinstein.2001 ; ; Lippincott , Williams and Wilkins

2. . Hansen B, Grieff J. Fractures of the tibia in children. Acta

Orthop Scand 1976;47:448.

3. Shannak A. Tibial fractures in children: follow-up study. J Pedi

atr Orthop 1988;8:306.

4. Dietz F, Merchant T. Indications for osteotomy of the tibia in

children. J Pediatr Orthop 1990; 10:486.

5. Yang J, Letts R. Isolated fractures of the tibia with intact fibula

in children: a review of 95 patients. / Pediatr Orthop 1997:17:347

6. Children’s Orthopaedics, Mercer Rang , 2nd edition; 2005; Lippincott , Williams and Wilkins

7. Rockwood & Wilkins’ Fractures In Children ; 5th Edition ; Beaty & Kasser ; Lippincott , Williams and Wilkins

8. Campbell’s operative Orthopaedics,2007; 11th edition, S. Terry Canale , James H. Beaty; Mosby publications

Discussion

One comment for “ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA FOR REDUCTION IN PAEDIATRIC FRACTURES”

  1. I’m just commenting to make you understand of the helpful experience our girl obtained reading the blog. She figured out plenty of details, which include how it is like to have an awesome coaching heart to make the others with no trouble understand selected complex topics. You undoubtedly surpassed our own desires. Thank you for giving the great, healthy, informative as well as easy guidance on this topic to Tanya.

    Posted by Marvella Roenigk | June 2, 2011, 6:08 am

Post a comment