<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Institute of Paediatric Orthopaedic Disorders (IPOD) &#187; fracture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipodindia.org/tag/fracture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipodindia.org</link>
	<description>Institute of Paediatric Orthopaedic Disorders (IPOD)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA FOR REDUCTION IN PAEDIATRIC FRACTURES</title>
		<link>http://ipodindia.org/2009/07/acceptability-criteria-for-reduction-in-paediatric-fractures/</link>
		<comments>http://ipodindia.org/2009/07/acceptability-criteria-for-reduction-in-paediatric-fractures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fractures in Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthopaedician's Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient's Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post graduate Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipodindia.org/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Children's fracture have a great capacity to remodel. Yet a few of them result into malunion and deformity. In fractures of upper humerus in a young child large magnitude of angulations can be accepted where as physeal injury of lower femur involving articular carilage needs nothing short of anatomical reduction. The factors affecting the acceptibiloity cliteria are age, Site of fracture, Involvement of growth plate and articular surface, direction of angulation in line with axis of joint movement, ability of joint nearby to compensate for the malunion etc...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-72 alignleft" title="acceptibility" src="http://ipodindia.org/wp-content/themes/tma/images/uploads/acceptibility-300x193.jpg" alt="acceptibility" width="210" height="135" /></p>
<p>Taral Nagda taralnagda@gmail.com</p>
<h2><span style="color: #ff6600;">UPPER LIMB FRACTURES</span></h2>
<h3><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Proximal humerus:</span></strong></span></h3>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<ul>
<li> <span style="color: #00ccff;">&gt; 11 years of age</span> : &gt; 50 deg. Contact  &lt; 20 deg. angulation</li>
<li> <span style="color: #00ccff;">&lt; 11 years of age</span> :  relatively greater displacement and angulation can be accepted. Good to excellent long term outcomes can be expected regardless of the # displacement.</li>
</ul>
<h3><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Shaft humerus:</span></strong></span></h3>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Internal       rotation: &lt; 15 deg</li>
<li>Shortening:       upto 1 to 2 cms.</li>
<li>Displacement       and angulation:
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #00ccff;">&lt; 5 years </span>:   Total displacement, Upto 70 deg. angulation</li>
<li><span style="color: #00ccff;">5 to 12 years</span>: 40 to 70 deg. angulation</li>
<li><span style="color: #00ccff;">&gt; 12 years </span>:  50 % contact , &lt; 40 deg. angulation</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Supracondylar fracture humerus</span></strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Anterior        humeral line transecting capitellum</li>
<li>Baumann        angle &#8211; 70-78 deg. or equal to the other side</li>
<li>Intact        olecranon fossa</li>
<li>Translation        upto 30 %</li>
<li>Rotations        20-30 degrees</li>
<li>Varus/        valgus angulation not acceptable</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Radius ulna</span></strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> <span style="color: #00ccff;">&lt; 9 years </span>- 15 deg. Angulation, 45 deg. Malrotation, Complete displacement, Straightening of radius</li>
</ul>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> <span style="color: #00ccff;">9-14 years</span>- 10 deg. Angulation, 30 deg. malrotation, Complete displacement, Some loss of radial bow</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fracture radial neck</span></strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #00ccff;">Younger        children</span>:  30-45 degrees</li>
<li><span style="color: #00ccff;">Older        Children</span>:       15 degrees</li>
</ul>
<h2>LOWER LIMB FRACTURES</h2>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fracture neck femur</span></strong><strong> :</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></p>
<p>Only anatomical reduction is acceptable <strong> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fracture shaft femur: </span></strong></span></p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> <span style="color: #00ccff;">0-6 months of age:</span> &lt; 1.5 cm. Of shortening, &lt; 30 deg angulation in varus valgus plane,&lt; 30 deg. angualtion in AP plane</li>
</ul>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> <span style="color: #00ccff;">6 months -6 years: </span>&lt; 2 cms of shortening,&lt; 15 deg. angulation in varus valgus plane,&lt; 20 deg. anterior angulation</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #00ccff;">6 &#8211; 10 years</span> &lt; 1.5 cms. shortening, &lt; 10 deg. varus valgus angulation, &lt; 15 deg. AP angulation</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> <span style="color: #00ccff;">&gt; 10 years</span> &lt; 1 cm shortening,&lt; 5 deg. varus valgus angulation,&lt; 10 deg. AP angulation</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fracture &#8211; separation of distal physis of      femur</span></strong></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>In Salter Harris type 1 and 2 </em></p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> &lt; 10 years  &lt; 20 deg. anterior or posterior angulation</li>
<li> &gt; 10 years Only minimal AP angulation</li>
<li>&lt; 5 deg. varus valgus angulation</li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>In Salter Harris type 3 and 4</em></p>
<ul>
<li>Anatomical reduction and ORIF</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fracture tibial tuberosity</span></strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Only minimally displaced fractures with possible active extension of  knee to 0 deg. can be acceptable. Rest require ORIF</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fracture Patella </span></strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>&lt; 3 mm articular step off</li>
<li>&lt; 3 mm diastasis on xray</li>
<li>Intact extensor mechanism</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fracture of tibia and fibula</span></strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><em>A. Proximal metaphysis :</em></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p>Closed reduction to anatomic position or slight varus is acceptable</p>
<p><em>B. Diaphysis:</em></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="228" valign="top"></td>
<td width="120" valign="top">&lt; 8 years</td>
<td width="115" valign="top">&gt; 8 years</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="228" valign="top">Varus</td>
<td width="120" valign="top">&lt;10 deg.</td>
<td width="115" valign="top">&lt; 5 deg.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="228" valign="top">Valgus</td>
<td width="120" valign="top">&lt; 5 deg.</td>
<td width="115" valign="top">&lt; 5 deg.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="228" valign="top">Ant. angulation</td>
<td width="120" valign="top">&lt; 10 deg.</td>
<td width="115" valign="top">&lt; 5 deg.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="228" valign="top">Post. Angulation</td>
<td width="120" valign="top">&lt; 5 deg.</td>
<td width="115" valign="top">&lt; 0 deg.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="228" valign="top">Shortening</td>
<td width="120" valign="top">&lt;10 mm</td>
<td width="115" valign="top">&lt; 5 mm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="228" valign="top">Rotation</td>
<td width="120" valign="top">&lt; 5 deg.</td>
<td width="115" valign="top">&lt; 5 deg.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>C. Distal      tibial fractures </em></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Salter Harris type I &amp; II</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(i)  in patients with atleast 2 years of growth remaining: &lt; 15 deg. of posterior angulation,&lt; 10 deg. of valgus angulation,0 deg. of varus angulation</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(ii)  in patients with less than 2 years of growth remaining Angulation in all planes &lt; 5 deg.</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Salter Harris type III &amp; IV</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">&lt; 2 mm displacement</p>
<p><span style="color: #99cc00;"><strong>Bibliography</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p>1. Lovell and winter pediatric Orhtopaedics 5<sup>th</sup> edition Morrissey and Weinstein.2001 ; ; Lippincott , Williams and Wilkins</p>
<p>2. . Hansen B, Grieff   J. Fractures  of the tibia in children. Acta</p>
<p>Orthop Scand 1976;47:448.</p>
<p>3.  Shannak A. Tibial fractures in children: follow-up study. J Pedi</p>
<p>atr Orthop 1988;8:306.</p>
<p>4. Dietz F, Merchant T. Indications for osteotomy of the tibia in</p>
<p>children. J Pediatr Orthop 1990; 10:486.</p>
<p>5. Yang J, Letts R. Isolated fractures of the tibia with intact fibula</p>
<p>in children: a review of 95 patients. / Pediatr Orthop 1997:17:347</p>
<p>6. Children&#8217;s Orthopaedics, Mercer Rang , 2<sup>nd</sup> edition; 2005; Lippincott , Williams and Wilkins</p>
<p>7. Rockwood &amp; Wilkins&#8217; Fractures In Children ; 5th Edition ; Beaty &amp; Kasser ; Lippincott , Williams and Wilkins</p>
<p>8. Campbell&#8217;s operative Orthopaedics,2007; 11<sup>th</sup> edition,  S. Terry Canale , James H. Beaty;  Mosby publications</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ipodindia.org/2009/07/acceptability-criteria-for-reduction-in-paediatric-fractures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
